I can't see the relevance of his nationality, what matters is that he beat Djokovic, the world number 1 and a notoriously tricky opponent. He did it in 3 straight sets in near 50 degree temps on Centre Court and played brilliantly.
That, is all that matters, where he was born doesn't matter a jot.
I read some comments somewhere in a newspaper and people were saying all he had done was won at tennis, nothing else so why should he have a Knighthood.
He has actually donated money to charity. There is a rumour his wimbledon prize money or some of it may go the same way.
He is a quiet humble man who hasnt let it be known how much he has actually done. Last nights documentary was very enlightening.
His family raised £30,000 in the early days to send him to train, they sold family jewellery and whatever else they could. They are not affluent or elitist, just a normal family.
Training for any sport at that level is gruelling and being on court in that temperature for over 3 hours is exhausting. Their careers are short as a result and yes, lots do things for charity along the way.
I don't get all the negative around his win, it is really jarring me off now.
Quote: Originally posted by Camping nutcase on 08/7/2013
Excellent result - only saw the last game of the match as I was on a Scout camp pick up. Got in, logged on to see how it was going and immediately switched the telly on. So glad that I caught it.
Well, I am a British mongrel (half Welsh, half Scottish, born in England), and I don't care where AM comes from, he is British. Even if Scotland eventually becomes independent, surely it will surely still be a part of Britain? and who cares anyway?
A day of all things motorhome and campervan. The show is held both in the main indoor arena and across the grounds. Catering, hot drinks and food options are available. Easy access to the site and free parking included. Win one of five pairs of day tickets