Joined: 03/9/2004 Diamond Member 
Forum Posts: 4108
| Site Reviews Total: | 2 |
|
| Site Reviews 2026: | 0 |
| Site Reviews 2025: | 0 |
| Site Reviews 2024: | 0 |
| Site Reviews 2023: | 0 |
| Site Reviews 2022: | 0 |
| Site Reviews 2021: | 0 |
| Site Reviews 2020: | 0 |
|
| Site Nights 2026: | 0 |
| Site Nights 2025: | 0 |
| Site Nights 2024: | 0 |
| Site Nights 2023: | 0 |
| Site Nights 2022: | 0 |
| Site Nights 2021: | 0 |
| Site Nights 2020: | 0 |
|
Hi & welcome to the forum Chris Your reason for camping sounds familiar - we're speedway supporters. We used to travel as far as Glasgow (from Coventry) to watch a 2 hour meeting & then drive home the same evening. Camping has made our 'away meetings' so much more enjoyable and stress-free.
I've got no experience of any of these three tents, but looking at the spec I'd say the Blacks tent is far better, if you can put up with the fishes 
Both of the others are pitched 'inner tent first', so if the weather is wet then so is your inner tent! The Blacks pitches fly sheet first, so you can fix your nice dry inner tent in afterwards.
Also the Torino & Calgary are both 2000 hydrostatic head, whereas the Blacks is 3000, which means that it will take more rainfall without leaking.
------------- Jean
|