Insurance Quotes

Advertisement

Message Forums

Welcome Guest Register  Log In  Search  Latest Posts
 Reception - All Forums
   Caravans and Caravanning -  Caravan Repairs, Servicing and Maintenance
Share   Post on X / Twitter  Share on Facebook  Email
Subject Topic: Carbon monoxide detector testing
Post Reply
13/6/2018 at 5:19pm
 Location: None Entered
 Outfit: None Entered
View edridsdale's Profile View Profile   Reply to edridsdale Reply   Quote edridsdale Quote  
Joined: 13/6/2018

Standard Member
Standard Member

Forum Posts:   9

Site Reviews Total: 7
Site Reviews 2026: 0 
Site Reviews 2025: 0 
Site Reviews 2024: 0 
Site Reviews 2023: 0 
Site Reviews 2022: 0 
Site Reviews 2021: 1 
Site Reviews 2020: 1 
Site Nights 2026: 0
Site Nights 2025: 0
Site Nights 2024: 0
Site Nights 2023: 0
Site Nights 2022: 0
Site Nights 2021: 5
Site Nights 2020: 7

My approved caravan service engineer failed my Kidde CO detector when servicing my van to recent test procedure.
I contacted Kidde who asked me to return it for testing and as it was going back to the US, they sent me a replacement unit.
The result of the test was received today and the unit met it's specification and was not faulty.
How many others are being failed when tested to the latest test procedure.... Don't throw it away without checking it out....
The procedure may not be fit for purpose....


13/6/2018 at 5:35pm
 Location: Lichfield
 Outfit: Coachman Vision 450
View tango55's Profile View Profile   Reply to tango55 Reply   Quote tango55 Quote  
Joined: 15/5/2008

Diamond Member
Diamond Member

Forum Posts:   9593

Site Reviews Total: 23
Site Reviews 2026: 0 
Site Reviews 2025: 0 
Site Reviews 2024: 0 
Site Reviews 2023: 0 
Site Reviews 2022: 3 
Site Reviews 2021: 1 
Site Reviews 2020: 0 
Site Nights 2026: 0
Site Nights 2025: 0
Site Nights 2024: 0
Site Nights 2023: 0
Site Nights 2022: 11
Site Nights 2021: 3
Site Nights 2020: 0

Well, have you contacted the respective service engineer with the results before posting on here?
It's only fair that the engineer should be notified first and for him to respond and provide a valid explanation as to why there is a discrepancy in the findings. Maybe the equipment he is using needs calibrating in which case should have a certificate to confirm when the equipment was last tested and passed. The procedure may well not be fit for purpose but you need to find out what the engineers answer is first then take appropriate action for compensation if need be.


13/6/2018 at 5:40pm
 Location: None Entered
 Outfit: None Entered
View edridsdale's Profile View Profile   Reply to edridsdale Reply   Quote edridsdale Quote  
Joined: 13/6/2018

Standard Member
Standard Member

Forum Posts:   9

Site Reviews Total: 7
Site Reviews 2026: 0 
Site Reviews 2025: 0 
Site Reviews 2024: 0 
Site Reviews 2023: 0 
Site Reviews 2022: 0 
Site Reviews 2021: 1 
Site Reviews 2020: 1 
Site Nights 2026: 0
Site Nights 2025: 0
Site Nights 2024: 0
Site Nights 2023: 0
Site Nights 2022: 0
Site Nights 2021: 5
Site Nights 2020: 7

I certainly informed him and am awaiting his response. I did not mention his name deliberately..... And I am aware of the need for calibration of test equipment and certification, having been in the calibration of electronic and gas equipment for many years up to retirement.


13/6/2018 at 5:52pm
 Location: None Entered
 Outfit: None Entered
View edridsdale's Profile View Profile   Reply to edridsdale Reply   Quote edridsdale Quote  
Joined: 13/6/2018

Standard Member
Standard Member

Forum Posts:   9

Site Reviews Total: 7
Site Reviews 2026: 0 
Site Reviews 2025: 0 
Site Reviews 2024: 0 
Site Reviews 2023: 0 
Site Reviews 2022: 0 
Site Reviews 2021: 1 
Site Reviews 2020: 1 
Site Nights 2026: 0
Site Nights 2025: 0
Site Nights 2024: 0
Site Nights 2023: 0
Site Nights 2022: 0
Site Nights 2021: 5
Site Nights 2020: 7

I am not looking for compensation..... I suspect the procedure is at fault having read the specification of the detector.... It is highly unlikely that testing on the basis that a field service engineer can carry out with the limited resources available to him makes this procedure highly unreliable...and probably unrepeatable and as such may need to be reviewed by those specifying the new test procedure for units installed in caravans.


13/6/2018 at 8:54pm
 Location: South Wales
 Outfit: None Entered
View Sevenexile's Profile View Profile   Reply to Sevenexile Reply   Quote Sevenexile Quote  
Joined: 18/6/2014

Silver Member
Silver Member

Forum Posts:   145

Site Reviews Total: 0
Site Reviews 2026: 0 
Site Reviews 2025: 0 
Site Reviews 2024: 0 
Site Reviews 2023: 0 
Site Reviews 2022: 0 
Site Reviews 2021: 0 
Site Reviews 2020: 0 
Site Nights 2026: 0
Site Nights 2025: 0
Site Nights 2024: 0
Site Nights 2023: 0
Site Nights 2022: 0
Site Nights 2021: 0
Site Nights 2020: 0

The test that I’ve seen carried out is no more than putting the alarm it it’s teat mode, incasing it a bag and spray a gas in to the bag from the aerosol and sealing the hole back up and waiting the allowed time to see if the alarm activates. Far to many variables for the test to be 100% accurate. Seems to be the new thing to test according the AWS.


Advertisement



13/6/2018 at 9:09pm
 Location: None Entered
 Outfit: None Entered
View edridsdale's Profile View Profile   Reply to edridsdale Reply   Quote edridsdale Quote  
Joined: 13/6/2018

Standard Member
Standard Member

Forum Posts:   9

Site Reviews Total: 7
Site Reviews 2026: 0 
Site Reviews 2025: 0 
Site Reviews 2024: 0 
Site Reviews 2023: 0 
Site Reviews 2022: 0 
Site Reviews 2021: 1 
Site Reviews 2020: 1 
Site Nights 2026: 0
Site Nights 2025: 0
Site Nights 2024: 0
Site Nights 2023: 0
Site Nights 2022: 0
Site Nights 2021: 5
Site Nights 2020: 7

I suggest that anyone who has one of these devices goes onto the Internet and downloads the spec for their device and has a read of it.
At this point you will see how ridiculous this "test" is.... Concentrations of CO and exposure times are crucial and very small levels of CO take very long times to cause damage to people and high concentrations have the potential to kill in very short times... and an aerosol and a bag sprayed with an unknown concentration for a vague time period is bordering on comical.... and likewise the CO detector responds accordingly.... High levels.. Quick response and low levels very slow response.... But as always the devil is in the detail.... What about the middle of these two extremes.... Vague or what?
Who knows how many passes of this test are safe.... How can the aerosol concentration be evaluated when in the bag, how do they determine how long to wait and be safe.... Need I go on?



In order to post a reply you will need to register, or if already registered please log in here

Prev       Next
Quick Links - All Forums - Caravan Repairs, Servicing and Maintenance - Top of Page

     Share   Post on X / Twitter  Share on Facebook  Email


Latest News, Discounts and Competitions  see all...












    Upcoming Event

UKCS Meet Motorhome and Campervan Show Exeter 20/11 to 22/11

A day of all things motorhome and campervan. The show is held both in the main indoor arena and across the grounds. Catering, hot drinks and food options are available. Easy access to the site and free parking included. Win one of five pairs of day tickets


3489 Visitors online !

Free UKCampsite.co.uk Window Sticker  -  Add a Missing Campsite

[Message Forums]  [Caravan Sites & Camping]  [Company Listings]  [Features / Advice]  [Virtual Brochure]  [Special Offers]
[Reception]  [Competitions]  [Caravans & Motorhomes For Sale]  [Event Diary]  [Tent Reviews] 

[Contact Us] 



Please note we are not responsible for the content of external sites & any reviews represent the author's personal view only. Please report any error here. You may view our privacy and cookie policy and terms and conditions here. All copyrights & other intellectual property rights in the design and content of this web site are reserved to the UKCampsite.co.uk © 1999 - 2026


Advertisement


Advertisement

Advertisement